Mar 16

Massacre in Afghanistan – Time to End the Occupation

Statement by the Socialist Party USA, National Action Committee March 13, 2012

The bloody US occupation of Afghanistan reached a new low as a 38 year old US Army Staff Sergeant embarked on a killing spree that resulted in 16 civilian deaths.  Most of the victims were children, all were unarmed and many were not only shot and stabbed, but burned alive.  The solider had already done three tours in Iraq and had suffered a traumatic brain injury.  Despite this, the US military certified him as a sniper and shipped him out to join the occupying forces in Afghanistan – another tool in their killing machine.  So while Pentagon spinsters play off the attack as the action of one “troubled individual” with “family problems,” Afghan civilians see it for what it is – another illustration of the violence of an occupying army.

The killings come on the heels of mass protests in the capital of Kabul and other cities over the  burning of the Koran by the US military.  This, along with the videos of American soldiers urinating on dead Afghans has fueled the mass anger that was released in street protests and increased insurgent activity.  Afghan civilians have now spent more than a decade living under the military occupation of NATO forces led by the US government.   This means restrictions on civil rights, death by drone bombing and a seemingly endless  series of military offensives by NATO forces.

American elections have provided no relief to them as Barack Obama has proved to be every bit the war President that George W. Bush was.  Scandals about private mercenaries have done little to relieve the oppression.  And even the massive financial crisis that has gripped the Western world has done nothing  to weaken the will of the global militarists to rule over Afghanistan.  Deeply politically entrenched military weapons makers and military service company lobbyists have made common cause with war hawks in the Pentagon to ensure that the military occupations continue despite budget cutbacks elsewhere.

Only a globally coordinated anti-war movement that connects people in NATO countries with Afghan civilian groups can drive out the occupiers.  This movement will not be made by governments or NGOs or by social media outlets.  It can only come to life as a result of the determined resistance of everyday people who are willing to put their bodies on the line in the name of peace.

Instead of such a movement, Afghans have faced a series of betrayals by the West.  Under the guise of supporting democracy in Afghanistan, the US  installed Hamid Karzai as the puppet President of the country.  Not surprisingly, the Karzai government has proven to be a deeply corrupt and oppressive regime that aims at securing privileges for a close circle of friends while obeying the orders of the occupiers.  This has resulted in mass discontent in the population and the resurgence of support for Taliban resistance forces.  It is a cruel twist for Afghan civilians that Western Occupation has provided a new future for Taliban fundamentalism.

The recent acts of the Occupiers, especially the Koran burnings and the massacre of innocent civilians, demonstrate that this bloody occupation must end immediately.  Americans have a global responsibility to participate in a movement to remove US troops immediately.  This is a desperate short-term goal for the global anti-war movement that has resonated throughout the various Occupy Wall Street movements.  In the longer term though, we need more than this.  Our movement needs a sustained push to put an end to the Military Industrial Complex.

Many people ask Socialist Party USA members why we are running a candidate for President this year.  The killings in Afghanistan provided a clear answer to this question.  Stewart Alexander and Alex Mendoza carry a clear message of anti-militarism with them on the campaign trail.  The peace initiative they propose is one that can resonate throughout the globe.  An immediate 50% cut  to the military budget, the removal of US occupying troops, the elimination of all foreign military bases and the responsible elimination of weapons of mass destruction set the Socialist Party USA apart from the Democrat and Republican parties of war.

This is not about a “disturbed” 38 year staff sergeant or about building democracy in Afghanistan or about weakening the grip of the Taliban. Democratic Socialism is about building a peaceful world that puts an end to one of the greatest threats to human security in the 21st century – the US military.  Our democratic revolution is built upon the hopes and aspirations of millions of people throughout the world to live a life based on peace, solidarity and freedom.  The immediate removal of US troops from Afghanistan and a moratorium on drone bombings are small steps in that direction.  Only democratic pressure from below can make this happen.

Nov 07

City of Detroit:
Vote Tues. Nov. 8th
Reject the Proposed City Charter Revisions!
Vote NO on Proposal C!

Detroit Socialist Party Position Statement on City of Detroit 2011 Ballot Proposal C

The Detroit Socialist Party calls upon all city voters to cast a NO vote in the citywide municipal referendum being held on November 8, 2011 on approval or rejection of the Detroit City Charter amendments proposed by the City Charter Revision Commission.

While incorporating a partial and significantly modified version of the city voter-approved 2009 ballot proposal establishing for election of City Council by district, the currently proposed Charter revisions would further extend such legislative district divisions to the composition of virtually all of the city’s (predominately mayoral-appointed) boards and commissions. The true aim of such extensive regional partitioning of the city’s executive branch is to facilitate the (Democratic Party-based) Bing mayoral regime’s overarching “Detroit Works Project” objectives, geared toward sub-dividing different sections of the city between those targeted for city-service-concentrated gentrification efforts and those targeted for further city-service diminution and neglect.

Another equally insidious element of the proposed charter revisions is the addition of an entirely new section to the Charter titled “Elimination of Redundancy in Government.” In addition to requiring the City’s Legislative and Executive branches and City Clerk to publish comprehensive reports each election cycle on all efforts being undertaken to reduce and eliminate redundancy in services, programs, activities, and processes; the proposed new section would additionally stipulate that: “As much as practicable attempts shall be made to realign ser­vice delivery systems and eliminate operational duplication and inefficiency, which may include cooperative agreements with other government entities as allowed by law [italics added].”

Particularly when examined in light of the recently stripped away removal of municipal control over Detroit’s water department last September, as well as the recently renewed efforts of the Bing regime to establish full-scale privatization of the city lighting department by state region-wide electric power provider DTE Energy (on whose corporate board Bing long personally served), one can clearly discern that the overarching purpose of this new section is to provide greater backing and citable cover for the further expanded dispossession of Detroit city residents’ control over Detroit’s most valuable public assets and resources still remaining under municipal control.

In equally parallel relation to both the recently accelerated efforts to strip municipal control of the city’s most important public resources, and the newly proposed City Charter language oriented to directly accommodating such city resource abnegation, the state of Michigan’s newly expanded “Emergency Manger” law, enacted last March, directly provides for a state-appointed Financial Manager’s power to “enter into agreements with other local governments, public bodies, or entities for the provision of services, the joint exercise of powers, or the transfer of functions and responsibilities; enter into agreements with other units of government to transfer property of the municipal government…. [and] enter into agreements with other local governments, or with private entities to the extent provided by law, for the provision of services [italics added].”

Given Bing’s repeated proclamations, during only the past week, on both the probable inevitability of Detroit’s impending placement under Emergency Manager rule by the state, and his own personally willing desire to accept the position of Detroit’s Emergency Manger if appointed (as earlier leaked reports suggest has already been pre-arranged between Bing and the Republican Snyder regime in Lansing), one can also quite reasonably infer that such proposed Charter revisions are intended to provide for some token pretext of continuity between the dictatorial actions imposed by Detroit’s likely forthcoming Emergency Manager and the directly preceding City Charter revisions approved by the people before the termination of elected municipal governance.

In addition to the above new provisions proposed to be added to the City Charter, Proposal C also asks voters to approve the establishment of a new system of city-district elected “Community Advisory Councils” (CAC’s) to directly supplant the long-established duties and role of city-district elected Citizens’ District Councils (CDC’s) (to which the Socialist Party fielded an elected candidate in the most recently held election) and resultantly marginalize and inhibit their operational effectiveness.

In spite of assigning all of the same functions held by CDC’s to the new CAC bodies, the proposed new Charter provisions contrastingly bar CAC’s from ever receiving any municipal funding, prescribe for CAC elections to take place at the same time that City Council elections are held, and further leave out the limited watchdog and community defense powers of the CDC’s, as established under state law (1945 P.A.344), including the right to delay implementation of proposed development projects, require information from any city department, and require City Council hearings to be held on proposed development projects of concern.

The Proposal C charter revisions also remove the 2009 voter-approved change to allow for office-specific city wide election of the City Council President and Council President Pro-Tempore, and instead prescribe for the nine elected City Council members (composed of seven members elected by district and two elected at large) to select the holders of those two specified Council offices from among themselves. Since the City Council President temporarily assumes the office of city Mayor in the event of vacancy, this change would remove the 2009 ballot-approved right of city voters to determine which candidate shall stand eligible for mayoral succession.

Other amending changes within Proposal C include eliminating the Charter’s formerly contained residency requirement for appointed city officers, as well as new amendments to the Planning and Development Department section of the Charter, geared toward redirecting the Department’s main objectives so as to: “provide the sup­port, assistance and conditions necessary to retain businesses,” “develop and implement a strategic plan and program focused on recruiting and supporting emerging in­dustries” (read further widening expansion of the city’s massive corporate welfare subsidies to big business) and further to: “create con­ditions supportive of global trade” (read race to the bottom for cheap labor and corporate deregulation) [emphasis added].

Taken together, Proposal C is simply the latest maneuver by the Bing-Snyder alliance to further sweep away all remaining obstacles standing in the way of the ongoing raid on Detroit’s public resources by both corporate party politicians’ true political constituency. Detroit’s working class population has nothing substantively beneficial to gain from this proposal and should resoundingly reject it at the polls on Tuesday November 8th.

Oct 12

Occupy Michigan!

Join members of the Socialist Party of Michigan at the numerous people’s occupations emerging throughout the state in solidarity with the inter/nationally mobilized resurgence of class unity and mass action now rapidly expanding from the Occupy Wall Street actions. 

Together we can shut down the current system! Victory to the working class!

 

Occupy Detroit! (Website)
Beginning Friday Oct. 14th (4PM)
Opening March at:
Spirit of Detroit
(corner of Woodward & Jefferson) (map)
Encampment at:
Grand Circus Park
(corner of Woodward and Adams St.) (map)

Occupy Ann Arbor! (FB Page)
General Assembly:
Thurs. Oct. 13th (6PM)
at Liberty Plaza
(E. Liberty St. & Division St.) (map)
Daily Marches to Follow

Occupy Flint! (FB page)
Demonstration/Encampment
Beginning Fri. Oct. 14 (12PM)
at Bank of America
(503 Saginaw St.) (map)

Occupy Grand Rapids! (FB Page)
Beginning Mon. Oct. 10th (4pm)
4PM Daily March
at Ah-Nab-Awen-Park
(303 Pearl St.) (Scribner Ave. & Pearl St.) (map)
Overnight Encampment:
at Fountain Street Church Parking Lot
(24 Fountain St. NE) (map)

Occupy Kalamazoo! (FB Page)
Bank Demonstration:
Wed. Oct 12th (11AM)
Michigan Ave. and Burdick (map)
General Assembly Meeting:
Thurs. Oct. 13th (5:30PM)
Bronson Park
(S. Park St. & W. South St.) (map)

Occupy Lansing! (FB page)
Encampment Beginning
Fri. Oct 7th @ Reutter Park
(Kalamazoo St. & S. Capitol Ave.) (map)
Mass Rally:
Sat. Oct. 15th (10AM)
at the Capitol Building
(100 N. Capitol Ave.) (map)

Occupy Traverse City! (FB page)
Bank Demonstration:
Sat. Oct. 15th (12PM-12AM)
Chase Bank
(250 East Front St.) (map)

Occupy the U.P.! (Marquette) (fb page, website)
Beginning Sat. Oct. 15th (8AM)
Opening Rally/March at:
Harlow Park
(W. Washington St. & S. 7th St.) (map)

Please check the individually provided local FB/website links for any updates related to the local actions above.

Occupy Michigan
Occupy Wall Street
Occupy Together
Socialist Party USA – Occupy Wall Street Page


Jun 01

New SPMI Website

The Socialist Party of Michigan’s new website is now live.  You can find it at the same address – http://spmichigan.org.  If you have any suggestions, questions, comments, or concerns about the new website please direct them to web (at) spmichigan.org.

All content for the old website has been moved.  We expect there to be some broken links, if you find any, please let us know by sending an email to web (at) spmichigan.org.  The old site is still accessible at http://old.spmichigan.org.

May 31

Socialist Party of Michigan Set to Begin Statewide Ballot Access Petition Drive

Click Here to Fill Out our Petition Circulator Volunteer Form

Click Here to Make a Donation to the Socialist Party’s Michigan Ballot Access Petition Drive

Click Here to Download the Socialist Party of Michigan Petition Sheet
(Note: all petition sheets must be printed on 8.5″ x 14″ standard legal-size paper when circulated for signatures).

————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Due to the relatively small size of the SPMI’s state office mailbox, we ask that petition circulators please mail their completed petition sheets to SPMI State Secretary Matt Erard at the following mailing address:

Matt Erard
400 Bagley St. #939
Detroit, MI 48226

In the event that you are unable to pay the necessary postage costs for mailing your completed petition sheets, please contact the SPMI State Office by phone or email, and we will make our best effort to provide you with prepaid postage in the needed amount.

———————————————————————————————————————————————–

Beginning on Saturday May 28th, 2011, the Socialist Party will be conducting a statewide petition signature drive to finally return the Socialist Party’s long displaced party column and vignette to its rightful space on the Michigan ballot, and to restore the right of all Michigan voters to cast their votes for a socialist alternative at the ballot box.

In order to successfully satisfy the state of Michigan’s petition requirements for obtaining qualification as a “new” party for next year’s 2012 election and beyond, SPMI petition circulators will need to collect valid signatures from at least 32,261 registered Michigan voters, including at least 100 valid signatures from voters registered within each of at least 8 of Michigan’s 15 congressional districts. Since Michigan’s party qualification rules also bar the countable validity of any signature collected more than 180 days before the petition’s filing date, and correspondingly require that all of the signatures included within a party’s petition be filed together on the same date, we will need to complete the circulation and filing of the SPMI’s petition drive no later than July, 2012 in order to avoid having any of our earliest collected signatures invalidated due to their collection date.

While imposing a significantly massive undertaking upon any “new” political party seeking Michigan ballot access, Michigan’s political party qualification regime is made most exceptional by its highly contrastive lack of any substantive re-qualifying burdens for political parties once they have successfully obtained Michigan ballot status. Through the applied operation of the Michigan legislature’s 2002 amending changes to the state’s party status retention requirements (enacted only through arm-twisted political dealing), Michigan’s governing party access statute now serves to provide qualified parties with effectively permanent retention of their ballot status, as long as they continue to nominate candidates for any of the eight partisan races for statewide educational control board seats elected at every Michigan general election.

In contrast to many other states where a newly qualified ballot line can only be retained for one or two general elections, our investment into the successful qualification of a Socialist Party ballot line in Michigan is one that we can be quite reasonably certain of holding and sustaining for the long-term foreseeable future. Moreover, even in the event that the SPMI does not directly succeed in raising the full 32,261 signature threshold in the necessary time-frame, our ability to come as close as possible to reaching that signature threshold will serve a tremendous benefit to the SPMI’s position on several different grounds when we correspondingly commence a new federal district court challenge to Michigan’s current ballot access regime during the coming months ahead.

In order to succeed in this tremendous challenge to establish a Socialist ballot line for the state of Michigan, it is imperative that we receive a substantial level of direct support and assistance from supporters, sympathizers, and allies, which must extend beyond the SPMI’s own present card-carrying membership alone. In addition to our critical need to recruit the greatest possible number of additional volunteers to help circulate our petition sheets, we must also raise financial contributions on a sufficiently measurable scale to enable us to hire additional paid petition circulators whose supplementary usage served as an indispensable prerequisite to the successful petitioning campaigns of all four of Michigan’s presently qualified minor parties.

As officially published and affirmed by the Michigan Secretary of State’s office, the Michigan Campaign Finance Act has no application to contributions made toward a party’s ballot access petitioning efforts, and we are not required to record or disclose such contributions. Unless otherwise directly authorized for disclosure by a given donor, all public financial contributions to the SPMI made during the course of our current ballot access drive will be kept fully confidential. Whether you can help assist this effort by volunteering your time to help petition, or by contributing a portion of your hard-earned income to help finance its vitally necessary expenses; your help is both greatly needed and appreciated!

 

Suggested Events for Petitionining

Below is a list of upcoming public events that would be particularly conducive to collecting petition signatures. We encourage folks to collect signatures at as many events as they can, but not to limit petition circulating to event locations only. Follow the links for event info. All listed events are indicated to be free unless otherwise noted.

Sat. 9/10 (Detroit): Dally in the Alley Street Fair. 11am – 11pm in the northern Cass Corridor area between Forest St. and Hancock St., west of Cass Ave.

Thurs. 9/15 – Sun 9/17 (Troy): Troy Family Daze Festival/Fair. Thurs: 4pm-9pm; Fri: 4pm-11pm; Sat: 11am-11pm; Sun: (Pancake Breakfast only): 8:30am-12:30pm at the Zion Christian Church grounds (3668 Livernois Rd.).

Fri. 9/16 – Sun. 9/18 (Ferndale): DIY Street Fair. Fri: 5pm-2am; Sat & Sun: 11am-2am, on E. Troy St. (off Woodward Ave. – one block south of E. 9 Mile Rd.) in downtown Ferndale.

Fri. 9/16 – Sun. 9/17 (Lansing): Old Town BluesFest. Fri: 4pm-12:30am; Sat: 1pm-12:30am in the Oldtown area near Turner St. and E. Grand River Ave.

Fri. 9/16 – Sun. 9/18 (Muskegon): Michigan Irish Music Festival. Fri: 5pm-late evening; Sat: 11am-late evening; Sunday: 11am-early evening in the Heritage Landing area of downtown Muskegon.

Sat. 9/17 – Sun. 9/18 (Oscoda): Paul Bunyan Festival. Sat: 10am-6PM; Sun: 11am-4pm at Furlaw Field (Paul Bunyan Park) in downtown Oscoda.

Fri: 9/23 – Sat. 9/24 (Kalamazoo): Kalamazoo Irish Fest. Fri: 4:30pm-12am; Sat: 10:30am- 12am at the Arcadia Creek Festival Place -$8 admission ($4 with student ID).

Wed. 9/21 -Sun. 10/09 (Grand Rapids): ArtPrize. Opening Day: 6pm-10pm; Mon-Thurs: 5pm-8pm; Fri & Sat: 12pm-10pm; Sun: 12pm-6pm, at various local venues.

Sun. 9/25 – Sat. 10/1 (Hillsdale): Hillsdale County Fair. Sun-Sat: 1pm-10pm at the Hillsdale County Fairgrounds (115 South Broad St.).

Fri: 9/30 – Sun 10/02 (Trenton): Trenton Scarecrow Festival. Fri: 6pm-10:30pm (approx.); Sat: 10am-10:30pm (approx.); Sun: 11am-5pm, at the instersection of W. Jefferson and West Rd. in downtown Trenton.

Sat. 10/1 – Sun. 10/02 (Caseville): Caseville PumpkinFest. Sat: 10am-late evening; Sun: 10am-early evening at various town locations.

Sat. 10/1 – Sun. 10/30 (Hell): Hell-o Hollow Weekends. Live entertainment, costume parades and other activities each Saturday in the central Hell, MI business area around Scream’s Ice Cream on Patterson Lake Rd.

Thurs: 10/06 – Sun: 10/09 (Alpena): Great Lakes Lighthouse Festival at various times and town locations.

Fri. 10/7 – Ongoing: (Ann Arbor, Detroit, Flint, Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Lansing, Marquette): Local People’s Occupations Ongoing Throughout Michigan. Click here for links and info.

Fri. 10/14 – Sun. 10/16 (Charlevoix): Charlevoix Apple Festival. Fri: 12pm – 6pm; Sat: 10am-6pm; Sun. 10am-4pm in downtown Charlevoix

—More Suggested Petitioning Events to be Added—.

 

A Few Tips and Reminders for SPMI Petition Circulators

1. Always ask Signers Which County they Live/Vote in Before they Sign the Petition: Michigan’s party ballot access statute prohibits voters from different counties from signing on the same copy of a petition sheet. Consequently it is necessary to write the name of one Michigan county on the “County of ______” line at the very top of each petition sheet, prior to asking voters sign it, and to only use that sheet to collect signatures from voters who reside within the particular county named on the top of the sheet. Note that it does not matter which county a voter happens to be in at the time he or she signs the petition, as long as he or she signs on a sheet designated for his/her county of residence. For example, you certainly can complete a sheet of signatures from Wayne County voters while circulating petitions in Ingham County, just as long as you have such Wayne County voters sign on a separate sheet with “Wayne” written on the “County of” line at the top.

Accordingly, it’s always advisable to carry some extra fully blank petition sheets (i.e. without any county designation yet written at the top) with you while circulating, so that you can directly designate such sheets with the county applicable to any out-of-town Michigan voters who you happen encounter while circulating. This often also applies to student voters who are still registered to vote at their prior non-school residence, as well as voters who have recently moved from another county, but have still yet to change their voter registration from their prior address.

2. Be Mobile and Directly Approaching: The vast majority of people will automatically dismiss and/or ignore anyone who appears to be soliciting passersby from a stationary position on the sidewalk. You will always have vastly greater success when personally walking up to each potential signer, rather than counting on their willingness to stop and pay attention to your request for a petition signature at the point they happen to pass by the spot where you may be standing. Correspondingly, the very most reliably likely signers tend to be those who are themselves in a stationery position (e.g. sitting on a bench) at the point you approach them to request their signatures.

3. Remind each Signer of the Current Date While Signing. It is highly important to remind each petition signer of current date when they get to the final “date of signing” column at the end of the petition signature line. Otherwise you will almost surely find that as many as half or more of the people who sign your petition sheets will mistakenly put down their dates of birth rather than the current date. Since every preceding box on the signature line asks signers for some type of standard identifying information about themselves (i.e. their city/township of residence, signature, printed name, street address, and zip code), signers routinely tend to focus only on the word “date,” and assume that it’s asking for a form of individually specific information as well – i.e. their birth date.

4. Always Begin Each Signature Request with Reference to the Approximate Number of Signatures Needed: In other words always begin by stating something along the lines of “We need to collect thirty thousand signatures to….” Many potential signers are more likely to sign simply on account of the excessively daunting nature of the requirement.Additionally signers who are concerned that their signature may place them on some form of list they don’t want to be on (e.g. a party membership/registration/mailing list or some form of FBI list of subversives) tend to feel much less apprehensive when informed of how many signatures are needed, due to the effectively anonymizing impact of such a large number.

5. Use a Succinct and Issue-Directed Request Line: The substantive content on our petition sheet is limited only to the name of a political party, rather than any directly political statement or policy measure, as one contrastingly finds on petitions to qualify public ballot proposals (e.g. recalling Snyder, decriminalizing medical marijuana, etc.) Consequently, most people who have no formed opinion on, or meaningful familiarity with, the Socialist Party (much less the seemingly peculiar nature of a party ballot access petition), will generally be reluctant to sign – if only on account of the fact that they’d rather not be bothered to spend a whole minute or two filling out something that holds no meaning to them.

Consequently, you are much more likely to obtain a given stranger’s signature if you directly and initially request it in the context of highlighting a particular issue and position taken in the SP Platform. Whenever possible, of course, the specific political issue/position that you emphasize should be one of particularly prevalent importance to people within the local community and/or event in which your petitioning (e.g. abolishing EFM’s, ending U.S. imperialism in the Mideast, fighting budget cuts and school closures, establishing full marriage equality, mandating, universal student loan forgiveness, guaranteed employment, ending the drug war, building real mass transit, etc.).

6. Uses the Language of Voter Choice and Inclusion: Particularly when making direct reference to the Socialist Party in the course of requesting signatures, it’s best to always emphasize that signatures are needed to allow for the Socialist Party’s candidates to be included on the Michigan election ballot – or to allow voters to have the option of voting for Socialist Party candidates if they wish to do so. With simple respect to how the question is phrased, many voters will be much more likely their signature in support of allowing the Socialist Party’s candidates to be included on the ballot, then for adding the Socialist Party to the ballot.

7. Rebut Politically-Based Objections By Highlighting Support for Democracy as the Only Relevant Factor: Though it’s almost always a waste of time to get into any drawn-out arguments with people who decisively choose not to sign, those who are merely ambivalent should always be reminded that the petition has nothing to do with whether or not they support the Socialist Party or intend to vote for its candidates in any election. Rather, the only pertinent question is whether they support our right to be listed on the ballot so that our voters can exercise their right to vote for Socialist candidates if they wish to.

In other words, anyone who supports democracy should be willing to sign the petition, regardless of whatever other political party or divergent viewpoints they may personally align with or subscribe to or favor. When noting this you can also point to the language we’ve added along the free space in the far-right-hand column of the petition sheet, noting that signatures do not constitute any signer’s personal political support of the party listed.

8. Always Remember to Complete the Circulator Certificate After You’ve Finished Circulating Each Petition Sheet: A petition sheet is not valid until the person who circulated it for signatures has filled out the circulator certificate in the bottom right hand corner of the petition sheet. The circulator certificate can be filled out without completing all of the available signature lines on a given petition sheet, but no further signatures may be added to a that particular sheet after its circulator has filled out the circulator certificate portion of the sheet.

9. An Invalid Signature does NOT Affect the Validity of Other Signatures on a Given Petition Sheet: There is a commonly repeated myth that the presence of an invalid signature on a given petition sheet will result in the entire sheet being thrown out, regardless of the validity of the other signatures it contains. In some instances, petition signatures who are erroneously led to believe this myth, become excessively over-cautious about ensuring the validity of each signature they collect (e.g. refusing to collect signatures from people who have recently moved or not recently voted, etc.).

Fortunately, this widely believed myth is entirely false. On Michigan election petitions, an invalid signature does not affect the validity or countability of any other valid signatures that happen to appear on the same petition sheet. Correspondingly, while it is true that some types of Michigan election petitions impose a maximum limit on the total number of signatures that can be submitted on a given candidate’s petition, there is no such maximum limit imposed on the number of signatures that can be submitted on the ballot access petition of a Michigan political party.

Matt Erard

400 Bagley St. # 939

Detroit, MI 48226